Subscribe to South Asia Citizens Wire | feeds from | @sacw
Home > Resources / Links > Study on Violence, Armed groups and Elections | Aila M. Matanock and Paul (...)

Study on Violence, Armed groups and Elections | Aila M. Matanock and Paul Staniland

9 September 2018

print version of this article print version


Armed actors are often involved in electoral politics, from the fusing of ballots and bullets in armed political parties to insurgents covertly backing politicians. We develop new concepts and theory to better understand these complex relationships between violent actors and democratic practice. We first offer a novel conceptualization of armed groups’ electoral strategies that systematically maps out variation in the organizational directness and public openness of groups’ involvement in elections. We then use comparative case studies to develop theory about the conditions under which each of these electoral strategies is most likely, and what can trigger changes between them. The interaction of armed groups’ power and expectations of popular support with governments’ policies of toleration or repression determines the strategies of electoral participation that groups pursue. These concepts and arguments lay the foundation for a systematic research agenda on when and how “normal” and armed politics become intertwined.

How and Why Armed Groups Participate in Elections by Aila M. Matanock and Paul Staniland
in: Perspectives on Politics, Volume 16, Issue 3, September 2018 , pp. 710-727