Archive of South Asia Citizens Wire | feeds from sacw.net | @sacw
Home > Human Rights > India: Bail for Lingaram Kodopi and Soni Sori - Text of Supreme Court Order (...)

India: Bail for Lingaram Kodopi and Soni Sori - Text of Supreme Court Order - 12/11/2013

12 November 2013

print version of this article print version

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).7898/2013 (From the judgment and order dated 08/07/2013 in MCRC No.2806/2013 of the HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR)

LINGARAM KODOPI Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF CHHATISGARH Respondent(s)
(With office report)
WITH
SLP(Crl) NO. 7913 of 2013
(With appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and office report)

Date: 12/11/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA

For Petitioner(s)
SLP(CRL.)7898/13
SLP(CRL.)7913/13
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv.
Mr. Ramesh K. Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Amiy Shukla, Adv.
Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Adv.
Mr. V.A. Mohta, Sr. Adv.
Mr. A.P. Mayee, Adv.
Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Adv.
Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Choudhary, Adv.
Mr. Nilkant Nayak, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Although in view of our order, dated 1st November, 2013, the relevant record has been produced, but no responsible officer familiar with the record, who could assist the Court

Page No.1 of 4

in examining the same is present. Only some police officers who are unable to assist the Court have produced the record.

Mr. V.A. Mohta, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the State of Chhatisgarh, has submitted that no officer could attend as they are all on election duty. He, therefore, seeks an adjournment for two weeks, so that the concerned officer can attend the proceedings.

It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner-Lingaram Kodopi- in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.7898 of 2013 has been in custody since 9th September, 2011 and the petitioner-Soni Sori in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.7913 of 2013 has been in custody since 4th October, 2011. Since it is going to take some time before a responsible officer can be present in Court in assisting the examination of the record, we are of the opinion that it would be unjust to continue the incarceration of the petitioners during the pendency of the applications for bail. We are also mindful of the fact that Soni Sori, petitioner in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.7913 of 2013 has been acquitted in five earlier cases. Similarly, petitioner Lingaram Kodopi in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.7898 of 2013 was also acquitted in the earlier

Page No.2 of 4

matter. It has also been stated that B.K. Lala, co-accused has also been granted bail on 4th February, 2012. In these circumstances, we are of the opinion that it would be appropriate to direct that the petitioners be released on interim bail during the pendency of the bail applications. However, keeping in view the submissions made by Mr. V.A. Mohta, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the State of Chhatisgarh, it would be in the interests of justice to direct that the petitioners shall not enter the State of Chhatisgarh during the period in which they are granted interim bail. It is ordered accordingly.

At this stage, it has been brought to our notice by Mr. Colin Gonsalves, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner in Special Leave petition (Criminal) No.7913 of 2013 and Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in Special Leave petition (Criminal) No.7898 of 2013 that the petitioners have not met their families for a long time and it would be only humane if they are permitted to meet their families before they travel to Delhi.

In view of the above, we direct the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police to depute some responsible police officers to escort the petitioners to their respective villages so that

Page No.3 of 4

they can meet their families for a period of 24 hours. On the following day, the petitioners shall be escorted to Delhi. They shall be permitted to reside in any locality of their choice in Delhi. Once the petitioners reach Delhi, they are directed to report to the In- charge of the local Police Station once a week. They shall report to the In-charge of the local Police Station every Sunday at 11.00 a.m.

Let the matters stand over till 3rd December, 2013.

We reiterate that it is necessary that some responsible officer who is familiar with the entire investigation should be present in Court on the next date of hearing to explain the entire record to the Court and also to clarify any doubts which may be raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
This order shall be faxed and communicated to the Welfare Officer, Central Jail, Jagdalpur, Chhatisgarh and the concerned authority today itself for necessary action.

(VINOD LAKHINA) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Page No.4 of 4

India: Bail for Lingaram Kodopi and Soni Sori - Text of Supreme Court Order - 12/11/2013
Formatted PDF