“The Indian high commission in Uganda is involved in sex trafficking, that’s why the Indian government is covering this up". Somnath Bharti
NB: For Delhi's Law Minister to say this, with no rebuttal from the Union Government, is scandalous. To use documentation in the way the AAP leaders have done is to deliberately mislead the public. It is difficult to believe this is the law minister speaking.
Far worse for his party is their conduct over the entire Khirkee affair. Whatever be the facts of the case (and several Ugandan women have filed accusations against him), it was his and his party's moral obligation to ask him to step aside until the matter was cleared up. The leaders have instead resorted to technicality - they see no evidence to justify his removal, and will wait for the judicial inquiry. Do they not have a conscience? Can't they see that his behaviour has caused anguish as well as a political crisis, and even if the truth is completely on their side (which is questionable), the right thing to do would be to leave the post?
What about Mr Bharti himself? Is his post more important to him than his cause? Does he even have a cause? If he did, he could explain to his voters that he and his party would continue to fight for police accountability, but that his departure form the ministerial post was the right thing to do. Is ministership more important than the stature of his party?
A friend of mine made a serious observation: The AAP cannot distinguish between representation and leadership. Perhaps they cannot remove him, not only because he is incapable of stilling his arrogance & his ego; but more ominously because he has gained popularity in Khirki. That's why our 'mainstream' parties too, cannot get rid of men who have presided over ghastly acts. They were and are popular. If popularity is all that matters, we would not look up to Mahatma Gandhi (who's death anniversary is coming up on January 30) for standing up before murderous crowds in Calcutta in August 1947 and resisting violence & hatred with truth and non-violence.
Our friends in the AAP seem to have forgotten Gandhi. Had they adhered to his compass they would have calmed the situation in Khirki and done themselves a favour. They could have involved women's organisations for assistance and participation in a campaign against the alleged illegal activities in Khirki. Is Mr Bharti merely the MLA of Malviya Nagar or the Law Minister of India's capital?
Ordinary people, the 'aam admi' are often filled with prejudices and bias of caste, communal, and racial nature. They are quite capable of doing horrible things. Surely it is the moral obligation of political leaders to speak wisely, to pursue justice, but to do so in a fair-minded way, preserving the dignity of all concerned? Surely they are not required to run behind and re-inforce popular prejudice, but to speak reasonably, to urge restraint?
The AAP's victory in Delhi roused a lot of expectations and aspirations for a newer and cleaner politics. This is a movement more than a party, and numbers of its friends and well-wishers (among whom I count myself) are disappointed at the conduct of its leadership, as well as the seeming absence of conscience in the Law Minister. Popularity for the wrong reasons is poison - Dilip
Letters (from